DLC Battle pack 2

As the first one called DLC battle pack one, are we going to see a second one?|||Its called the Infinite War Battle pack. They call it DLC1 just in case they want to make a second one. Officially we dont have a clue if theres going to be a second one.|||Basically, square enix have to give GPG an edict to make the DLC wrapped around a big pile of money before they'll make it. The descision is entirely business. And given they have the money made by/spend on the first DLC, it's probably an easy decision to make.|||I'm afraid things aren't quite so cut and dry with supcom2 and DLC.
The thing is currently we have a split community, those who play with DLC and those who don't and those people almost never play together, a dicision made for the sake of balance, with that in mind even if the DLC would be profitable you still need to decide how it'll be handled, do you give DLC 1 owners a discount on the second and do a DLC bundle for everyone else or do you carry on making a third divide?
Now while the first idea there seems like a much better idea, people who bought DLC1 are far more likely to buy DLC2, thus more profit.
tbh, at this point an expansion with DLC1 and new stuffs would probably see far greater success than another DLC, but time will tell.|||DLC and non DLC players get to play together in the same game. DLC users get ability to construct DLC units, non-DLC users do not (unless they capture an opponent's engineer). DLC users get to host DLC maps, but everyone can join them (seen already with the exclusive maps). Balance the game for the DLC. Non dlc users that don't want this can enable the non-dlc exclusion when hosting the game.
Profit++
Though I'll admit this will still get arguments from people fearing that it will turn into a Pay to play, pay more to have fun model, like some of those other play4free games.|||I would like to see more DLC but it not really much fun anymore as playing the same maps over and over gets really dull,not to mention that the maps are to small for all the current units to really have a good game like in SC/FA.
I barely play SC2 as FA gives me more enjoyment.
The Devs could have had a massive game on their hands if they had kept everything from FA and added all the new stuff from SC2 plus the graphics of SC2.|||adamstrange|||Ladies and gentlemen, this is pure speculation, but I would like to bring your attention to the last post in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=50&t=50036&start=125
Allow me to quote steveb:
Quote:|||I too like to speculate based on selective context|||Okay... so what's your point? |||Well, my point is that you are very bad at interpreting english posts. Gb2 school.|||Mithy|||Nice ad hominem there. I'd still like you to re-educate yourself about the proper use of the english language so your retardedness doesn't show as much.
Thank you and have a nice day.|||Oh you're getting feisty! I must be on to something..|||The only thing you're on is crack cocaine. I strongly advise you to kick that habit, as it seems to have already inflicted irreversible brain damage. You're only 1 step away from being officially declared a vegetable.|||Is feeding time over now?|||I hope it is for you. Perhaps you should stop feeding on hot pockets and get back in shape you fatass.|||Cygmus|||Getting back to the point, Kahooli,
the highlighted quoted text does not at all imply another dlc.
It just puts enphasis on how ONLY one DLC was released a year after SC2's release, encouraging that it is at a very low frequency.
The correct way to interpret it is that since DLC release for SC2 is at snail-like speed, theres a possibility another DLC is released one snail-like speed later.

wait.
for your better comprehention, Kahooli:
Quote:|||Typical axioms, you tell us that we have to take all your "truths" for granted and base our whole mathematical knowledge on your shaky "self-evident" basis. Come back with proof of yourself or never show your face here again.|||Cygmus|||Quote:|||Cygmus|||Quote:|||Cygnuz